Section 497 (2) Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (C) and 51 bail, grant of further investigation did not affect recovery from the accused and he was also arrested on the spot where he was not arrested. The suspect was allegedly present. At the time of the raid, he did not belong to her, but he was someone else. The question is whether the confessional statement made by the accused involved with the police can be used against the accused or on the matter of the accused's involvement in the case, serious consideration is required. Is made against the accused, there was no reasonable basis for believing that the accused committed a non-bailable offense and, instead, in section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Substances. Further investigative grounds for the alleged embezzlement offense are available. The Act, 1997, in such a situation, would not be appealing to the State Counsel cannot show that the accused was convicted in any of the alleged criminal cases against H. IM and defendant's plea that he was acquitted in those cases was not disputed - the state council's case was extended for bail extension, the accused was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
