MST. ZAIBUN versus MEHRBAN
Section 5 and the Schedule Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120, on the basis of the evidence, the Family Court passed a decree for the previous maintenance of the Family Court for ten years, on the basis of evidence and to be commendable. Subsequent to the family law record decision made under the law made by the latter may not interfere with the extent of the claimant's privilege for past restitution, but no specific provision for previous restitution may be granted for a period of ten years. In order to file for maintenance, there is a limitation available, the resort had to abide by clause 211 of the Limitation Act 1908 There was a year restriction because a final restoration of six years could be allowed and beyond that, the claimant's claim would be banned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer