Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMSHAD versus THE STATE

498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (2) / 11 Ed interim pre-arrest bail, the accused has joined in the investigation except the accused alleges the accused by the complainant. In addition, no evidence was in the record. To show that the accused had committed adultery with the accomplices in the complainant's house, under Section 161, two witnesses to the prosecution, in their statements, CCPC stated that they Both accused were seen nude in the relevant history. The incident and their names were not mentioned in the FIR till the registration of the case. Such evidence was produced by the police and statements of the prosecution witnesses were recorded on the basis of the marriage contract. Was declared useless, indicating that the accused himself had entered the court. In a marriage with a co-accused, her ex-husband had divorced, whose affidavit was kept on record, then the case was reported. The defendant, who was unhappy with his sister's marriage / with the co-accused, reported the matter to the police and accused Adam of making exaggerated allegations against interim pre-arrest bail. In the circumstances, the suspect was confirmed best advocate from Shorkot lawyer