Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus DHUMAN

Section 8 and 42 of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (IX of 1948), Section 2A [which is incorporated by the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) (Amendment) Ordinance (XIII of 1983) of the land. For the title declaration, the original owner sold the land for sale to the seller, who later sold the same prediction to the seller by the original owner, which his brother challenged on the basis that the original owner Has no legal requirement to justify the sale and was also told that the suit was dismissed without trial by the trial court, but the appellate court ruled in the trial court's order and order. He set aside and determined the right of conversion of the original owners, including his brother Plaintiff, as a subsequent shopkeeper, trying to declare this suit property on the title. As incorporated by the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Ordinance, 1983], the original owner should be considered its absolute and non-controversial owner of section 2A of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act 1948. In view of the supply, the original owner / seller must be considered as the absolute owner of the suit land, and thus with the title that was previously conveyed to the buyer. He said that in the interest of the plaintiffs, the first seller to legally convey the legality of supplying the law, though the order passed by the appellate court in favor of changing the original decree Was done, it was for that reason. Under Section 2A of Section 2A of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act, 1948, the plaintiffs sued for ownership in the interest of the plaintiffs. property advocates from Landi Kotal lawyer