Find a Lawyer

MST. AISHA BIBI versus THE STATE

Section 171717 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/34, appealed against the accused in a bad trial, primarily on the basis of the evidence of the accused for the last time with the accused, including the victim of the trial court. There was the recovery of crime weapons and blood-stained clothing. Each piece of evidence was discussed and examined momentarily for the material and legal aspects of the case, even the evidence of the prosecution witnesses who saw the victim last with the accused, facing contradictions and improvements. Had to do, which they did not trust. Things have rightly come to the conclusion that the integrated evidence was not of the standard that would prove to be the last time the victim was found, reliable or connected to the crime, the trial court did not make a false one. Or had misidentified or neglected the important one or neglected it. In some of the evidence, justice did not appear to have had any abortion of justice while seeking intervention in the trial, while dealing with the appeal against failure to appear in the appellate court case, the trial court's opinion The proper weight was to be given and the appeal against the acquittal was dismissed in the circumstances family advocate from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer