GHULAM MURTAZA versus THE STATE
Sections 498 and 497 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), bail before section 302/324/109, confirmation of further investigation neither the accused was present at the scene of the incident nor was there any injured or injured. Has been held responsible. The names of the FIR cases were mentioned even though the incident allegedly came up with the recovery of the accused, but the names of the witnesses were not given any details of the conspiracies by them. The prima facie story of 's was forgotten. The possibility of falsely accusing the accused party of being a real brother and the real uncle of the original accused cannot be denied, expanding the network by the complaining party to include as many persons as possible from the accused party. The purpose of the pre-bail was to protect innocent civilians, the matter of further inquiry of the accused involved in further information of the accused, one of the suspects already confirmed bail pre-arrest, and other suspects The arrest warrant was later granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Domeli lawyer