Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SOOMAR versus THE STATE


Section 324/392/393/394/34 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (B), has been charged with defining the evidence that the accused has filed against the trial court. Did not press his appeal against the verdict, but requested that the sentence awarded by the trial court be reduced. The dispute was that one of the accused was a youth and not a former culprit and he belonged to a very poor family and was suffering from conditions which led him to repent of his act and in the future. It was also decided not to be involved in such activities in the case of legitimate indicators of the co-accused. In that case, after the reduction, such a gentleman in the case of the state prosecuting attorney. The idea can be taken. The accused said that the convicted and sentenced to five years and a fine would meet the end of justice.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Shedani sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.