Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Conduct of Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/337 A (ii) / 337 L (ii) / 334/429/148/149/34 Guarantees, Further Investigation Grant Offered He was behind bars for the past six months, according to the FIR, and was accused of ineffective firing. That he had neither a gun recovered from it nor had he been recovered from the site of the alleged incident despite being on physical remand with the police for a long time. In all investigations, it was reported by the investigating officers that the accused was found empty-handed. It is alleged that the injured person was allegedly shown by the weapon which came under Section 337A (ii), PPC and it was stated that Section 497, CRPC. The prohibition clause does not and it is yet to be. It was seen whether the accused could not successfully deny the common intention of the joint conspiracy with the other accused. All the factors stated by the accused will lead to further investigation of the accused, in which case the accused was admitted on bail. advocate for immigration from Ubaro lawyer