MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 bail, further investigation grant name of the accused was disclosed to the complainant by the co-accused and no test identification parade was held after the arrest of the accused. Was gone, and there was no compelling evidence, except that the recovery case was available before the accused could be proven guilty, before the police's first ? ow could be of no avail. Was, because in accordance with Arts 38 and 39 of the 1984 Act of Evidence, it was unacceptable in evidence, the allegations against the requirement of the accused, during further investigation, Under the section 111111 clause, the PPC did not draw on the prohibited clause of section 7497, the CCPC accused was no ex-offender, he was admitted in bail, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer
