Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus GHULAM MUSTAFA

Section 115 amendment jurisdiction was strictly to interfere with the factual findings of the exercise of the court's jurisdictional jurisdiction, however, following such restriction, the courts fell below the rationale, however, it was aware that both courts were aware of the evidence. Will examine the truth and appreciate the evidence placed before them. The first appellate court was dressed as the final court, it was important that the decision it presented was a reflection of the proper dispute between the parties and that, after examining all the issues and implications of the case decisions. It had come to an informed decision. In the present case, the justice presented by both the courts was not in accordance with the administrative rules of justice and the final decisions and orders of both the courts were set aside and the trial court was remanded to the trial court so that each After giving specific results, the matter can be further decided. Issue and after considering the evidence on record patent advocate from Orakzai lawyer