Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BAKHSH versus AUQAF DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB

Sections 7, 11 and 12 occupied the property by notification of the Dedicated Property Administrator and assumed responsibility for the property, as well as administration, control, management and restoration as regards the Dedicated Property. It is reported that the appellant was arrested before the district by the appellant who claimed that the properties were not immovable, but were owned by the appellants, claiming that he and his predecessor were from the tenth period. Such a petition was dismissed by the District Judge whose order had been finalized. . Thereafter other persons also claimed ownership of these properties, but their claim was also rejected by the High Court in an appeal notification under which the administrator had taken the property under the property, before the High Court. It was legalized, resulting in finality. The appeal, then, was controversial because of the power over immigration advocates contact from Chilas lawyer