Find a Lawyer

AQEEL AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 324/353/225/148/149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the testimony of section 7 (h) was defined at the moment when the detainees of the house showed resistance when the Datano woman was recovered. Detenio did not endorse the prosecution's version to the extent that it was recovered from inside the home by Belfort, an offense punishable by conviction, sentencing and sentencing under Section 7 (h) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Was not set up. On one side, the suspects allegedly attacked the police party and Belfast raided the police company as a representative of the prosecution case. All the suspects proved beyond any doubt, the accused in this regard. The crime was sustained. There was no intention of committing the murder and the incident did not take place at the time of the incident, the recovery of the woman in the custody of her parents' house was to be taken effect, the possibility of resentment or resistance, not denial. Could the accused have faced trial for a period of two years, the accused was sentenced due to the strange circumstances of the case, but accordingly the sentence was reduced. ask a advocate free from Shahdad Kot lawyer