Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD ALIAS BILLA versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence Two of the four accused named in this case were acquitted; after the trial, the accused named in the case was acquitted; they were standing in the street so that no one could complain. Could not come from. Of the other two accused, there was no enmity of false imputation, the prosecution's witness being the widow of the accused was a natural witness because the testimony of her presence in the house testified By the way, imagination cannot be doubted. Although the injured female eye witness was excluded because of unnecessary injury and she was almost 85 years old, otherwise the court would have to look at the quality of the evidence and not the quantity. The man was seen jumping from the roof of the house when the suspect's mark was found to be stained with human blood after recovering a knife, according to the serologist Moto's report, keeping the aforementioned suspect fully punished and punished. Was appealed and to that extent the appeal was dismissed. The co-accused was the brother of the main accused, but no crime was recovered on his identification and he was also found. The innocent was not spoken to by the police as a co-accused; the possibility of lying to the co-accused, in these circumstances, could not be denied, the appeal was accepted and sentenced to the extent of the co-accused. Was heard, he was set free and he was acquitted of the charges against him famous high court advocate from Kurram lawyer