MESSRS UNITED KASHMIR FLOUR MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED COMPANY versus GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Article 44 Notification No FS / H 6 (19) 49 1742 2002 Dated 179 2002 Writing petition authorities had assured the applicants in the present case and on the management's assurance that the applicants invested large sums in the establishment process. Was Mills, but the above-mentioned assurance and affidavit notification was canceled by the authorities without giving the applicant any opportunity to hear, and thus the applicants were condemned with unreasonable justification, the authorities were obliged to inform the applicants Issue the showcase notice is based on allegations that the authorities wanted to cancel the aforesaid notification, but when no such showcase notice was given to the applicants, the notification issued by the authorities was not sustainable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer