Find a Lawyer

KABIR AHMED versus THE STATE

Complaint Complaint and Late Entrance 302/324/452/457/459/34 The complainant and the late entered the house when the accused was committing robbery, who may have been charged with panic and his co-accused. Put a knife on it to save himself. The complainant and the accused were there to improve their escape and the incident occurred momentarily, neither the case nor the accused nor their accomplices had any intention of imposing the death sentence. In the circumstances, the reasonable and trial court's belief was that it could not be held that the accused could be held liable for his own liability, as there was no evidence that the accused had joint intentions. Had committed the murder of Mutofi in his offer. The assassination statement by the accused or the accompanying accused cannot be concluded with certainty that the trial court's reliance on the confessional statement of the accused was to the extent of invalidity and it excluded the invalid part. The accused stated that the deceased had been shot with a knife by the co-accused and that it was said that part of the statement was confirmed by Fird Bian, which stated that he attacked the complainant and confessed to the victim. Confirmation of the crime cannot be doubted. It was voluntarily recorded and was true and was corroborated by the statement of the Complaints Investigation Officer, who was an important witness to the defense as well as the defendant, the confessional statement of the accused and the statement of the investigating officer. Was not believed, it was not tested. The investigating officer will not fail the trial, in which case, the victim advocate from Havelian lawyer