Sections 108 (b), 2 (26) (c), 50, 143b, 142 and 116 Income Tax Rules, 1982, R61 Section RO 943 (I) / 79, dated 17 10 1979 of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Establishment Ordinance (2000V of XXXV); Section 2 (3) Failure to supply total income and return of certain expenses was not paid for attracting the provision of Section 50 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 as provided on the factory lease. Was filed and no statement was filed under section 143B. (b) The submission of monthly statements of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, was required to be submitted under section 142 of the Income Tax Ordinance by default, the fine passed in 1979 was arbitrary and effective, as the records show. Contrary to the facts. Against the law and thus the corruption was proved on the county that along with the process, the decisions of the Special Officer and Additional Commissioner of the concerned inspector were also inappropriate to the law as well as the decision was misleading, disobedient, unlawful and forced. ; The decision was made on an irrelevant basis. The decision involves the use of powers for excessive administrative purposes to deny the complainant a reasonable refund, and the repeated judgment proved incompetent and incompetent for the Special Officer, as well as the Inspecting Additional Commissioner. Also fulfilled their duties and responsibilities. The Commissioners may amend by writing an order under section 2121 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to rectify the errors in the record order and to initiate proceedings against the Special Officer under the FCC and Dispensary Rules 1973. Commit and act against them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
