STATE PETROLEUM REFINING AND PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT). LTD., KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Second Schedule, Part I, CL 56 (2) (ii) and Section 96, 102 CBR Letter C No. 44 (16) ITV / 78, dated 17 7 1978 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Establishment of office, Section 2 ()) Rebate Pension Fund The deduction of tax from the Exemption Pension Fund is a refund for the same department claiming that the claim for refund was withheld over time. The assertion of correctness was that the income in question was pension fund, the income of the tax was exempt. Any deduction or tax on the income of the fund was forbidden and the tax was illegally taxed as it could not be taxed because it could not be illegally recovered any tax. Could not be denied on the ground. Deportation committed misconduct by responding to four letters and retaining the amount illegally deducted and refusing to refund the time limit request. After that, section 99 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was not required to receive the section of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the amount of Rs 40,000 be received along with the compensation. Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, shall be paid to the Complainant / Reviewer within 30 days
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
