Find a Lawyer

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, MUZAFFARABAD versus MAJOR SHAHPAWAL QURESHI

The Azad Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII44 of VIII), the appeal from the Supreme Court to section eal42 cannot be implemented by the enforcement of the legal representatives of the respondents, in the present case, against all the defendants against them. Claimed the same relief in favor of There was a statement from the appellant and the fact that the High Court in the dispute was not dedicated by the respondents' predecessors for any purpose which is considered religious, charitable and charitable by Muslim law and On the basis of such declaration, it was that the High Court found that issuing a notification to administer property control and management under the property was not lawful. Such a decision of the High Court cannot be fully appealed in favor of the respondents as it has not been implemented. Therefore, the legal representative of the deceased defendant was disqualified and was liable to be excluded in this way, only after entering into the merits of the case, did the appellant take responsibility for offering the exact addresses of those persons. Those against whom he sought any relief from the Supreme Court, if his willful negligence, the appellant filed an unqualified appeal, could not be taken care of, especially to that extent. It can be claimed against any court under any legal law that can be strictly observed on the legal requirements of a law or rule applied to judicial facts when the appellant is asked about the death of the defendant. He knew he had taken no action. The record states that the respondents' convictions jobs for advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer