Find a Lawyer

STATE PETROLEUM REFINING AND PETROCHEMICAL, CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

Second Schedule, Part I, CL 56 (2) (ii), Sections 96 & 102 CBR Letter C No. 44 (16) ITV / 78, Date 17 7 1978 CBR Letter C No. ITB3 (6) / 85, dated 27 3 1985 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV 2000V), Section 2 (3) Tax deduction from waiver pension fund to section 99 (2) Claimant. To submit an application under b) Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, with validity of tax deduction for implementation and tax return issuance, was the validity question on the prescribed form when deduction of funds was required to deduct such action. Was malicious by agencies. The deduction has been made, the Assessing Officer was obliged to confirm with the deduction agency about the deduction for which the refund was claimed / the complainant filed a refund in the prescribed form. , This claim should have been decided on their merit. Verification that deductions from the department's support record should be provided by the Complainant / Reviewer Federal Tax Ombuds if required It is recommended that the petitioner's / SC's request for a refund be processed Be completed and decided within 15 days. law firms from Kot Bunglow lawyer