Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUNSHA NASIR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 59 (1) CBR Circular No. 4 2001, Dated 18 6 2001, Para 9 (A) (ii) Self Assessment Scheme CBR Circular Letter No. 7 (7) Assistant / 2001, Dated 26 3 2001 Federal Establishment of Tax Office Ombudsman Ordinance (2000V of XXXV), Section 2 (3) Self-Assessment Assessment Real estate real estate from 2001 to 2001 Without recording any reasons for dissatisfaction with the sale of wheat to the real estate agency. The complainant / reviewer satisfactorily stated all the matters that he had encountered by the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax and why the reason was disclosed to the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax. For his belief that this is a revenue matter, the Regional Commissioner of Inefficient and Real Estate Income Tax did not record any reason for his dissatisfaction with his own reasons for the Complainant / Assessee's re-audit. The choice of return was expressly deemed to be a law which, without any proper order or violation of the parameters specified by the rules or binding orders, would be lawful, arbitrary and irrelevant. Based on the corruption that attracted the jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman, therefore, the established federal taxation Hatsab recommended that the Central Board of Revenue be directed to exclude the withdrawal from the list of selected cases under paragraph 9 (a) (ii) for audit. Acceptance under the Self Assessment Scheme best law firm from Nowshera Cantt lawyer