MST. YASMIN versus THE STATE
The testimony of section 9 (c) evidence was the sealing of the allegedly recovered drug parcel, except that the official seal of the Investigation Officer except the recovered witness marijuana ample sample was not admitted in the presence of the recovered witness and the whole The action was taken. The entire investigation conducted in this case was not only suspicious but also dishonest in the room of Section H, as well as the opinion of the Chemical Examiner, as the whole exercise broke the entire structure of the prosecution case. Yes, the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Mangla lawyer
