Find a Lawyer

MUSLIM KHAN versus THE STATE

The accused accused of defining Section 302 (b) evidence was directly named, in which a special role of firing on the complainant in the instant-filed FIR justified his presence on the spot. And fully supported the prosecution version, inside the shop on a bright day the murder was committed. According to a report by the forensic science laboratory, the recovery of the accused for more than five months and the felony complaint, the recovery of blood, guilt, pill and electric bulb had completely established the site of the incident. ? As the case was a single accused, no question of alternative or misidentification could be raised; there was no previous rivalry between the parties when the complainant was accused of making false accusations against the accused. It was maintained that it was merely the fact that the prosecution's case was linked to the complainant's lone statement. Or was it intended to be a mystery, by itself, that it was not a ground or that the accused had killed a 22/23 year old boy who was preparing for an intermediate exam, by lowering the sentence? There was no shortage of circumstances to prevent the death sentence set for the crime of murder. The life given to the accused was converted to death accordingly tax advocates from Padidan lawyer