Find a Lawyer

MESSRS DANYAL SHAWAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, WAH CANTT. versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 59 (1) CBR Circular No. 2002 2002, Article 18 6 2002, Para 9 (a) (ii) Self Assessment Scheme, 2002 2003 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000). , Setting aside the section 2 (3) self-assessment, assessment year 2002 2003 sufficient evidence to justify the separation of cases for total audit due to low profit rate to show that the complainant / reviewer The gross profit announced by was not lower than the net. In many cases profits are declared or applied, and in fact the complainant's / the plaintiff's net profit rate was also very reasonable in the context of the department's agreement with the developers of the land as the case was based on the gross profit rate. Was selected for the audit based on. Otherwise 25% was prominent and as a result the net profit rate was less than the complainant's case for audit, based solely on the complainant's case for audit. ? Secondly, was not valid The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the complainant withdraw from the selected cases for total audit under paragraph (a) (ii) of the Self-Assessment Scheme, 2003 and accept the declared income. Be done inheritance advocates near Mastoi lawyer