Find a Lawyer

C.A. NO.958/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 4TH MARCH, 2002. versus C.A. NO.958/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 4TH MARCH, 2002.

Sections 17 and 156 (1) (8) were imported in violation of section 13 or section 16 of the Customs Act, 1969, on the upper side of the chassis with the tractor registration car The laboratory's review report shows that the chassis plate was cut and welded due to non-duty duty due to confiscation of the right, but no one other than the one on the chassis was canceled. Under the fact that the vehicle was not registered in the excise and taxation department. For many years and it was discovered that a tractor was running with the allotted registration number and it would not be due to the special duty of the vehicle when its authorized status was confirmed by the Chemical Authorization Report. Of The inspector did not forward the case to the prosecutor because after chemical treatment no other number could be considered except that the one mentioned in the TI imports the documents and the occupied vehicle raised the chassis plate. Even if one is found and welded upside down, it cannot be that the entire chassis plate was replaced, this order was placed along the direction that was seized. Without any condition the vehicle will be released to its lawful owner immigration advocates from Naseerabad lawyer