S.T.A. NO.314/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 21ST FEBRUARY, 2002. versus S.T.A. NO.314/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 21ST FEBRUARY, 2002.
Section, 33 33 and 34 34 Taxes were not brought to the file for the purpose of extra tax and penalty as well as the sales tax claim accuracy on the non-service of the preceding partial review notice, and the absence of such record. It can be confidently stated that none of these notices were not presented to the appellant and that is the case, the adjudicating officer's previous party order was invalid and could not be sustained. And the trial was released. After hearing the parties and obtaining evidence that they may like to present, the Appellate Tribunal for fresh judgment in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Warah lawyer
