Find a Lawyer

GHAFOOR KHAN versus SPECIAL JUDGE, CUSTOMS TAXATION AND ANTI-SMUGGLING, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Sections 2 (1) (a), 30, 31, 32 and 43 give notice to the legal heirs of a person who is suspected of allegedly smuggling drugs and obtaining assets by confiscating assets. Anti-narcotics force submitted information against. Under Section 31 of the Smuggling Prevention Act 1977, the complaint before the Special Judge alleging that the appellant's interest in the late property and the money deposited in the account of his minor grandchildren Has been declared a derivative of smuggling and can be seized. Special Judges of the Federal Government issued notices to Customs, Taxes and Anti-Trafficking in the pursuance of this complaint / notice, to legal heirs / appellants of late interest, and afterwards, to Appellants for their evidence. After allowing, the appellants filed an appeal under section 43 of the Smuggling Prevention Act, 1977, on the names of the seized and confiscated assets and sums which were appellants. The person in section 31 of the Smuggling Prevention Act 1977 cited a person accused of smuggling and who, in his name or in his name? His relative or partner was suspected of illegally obtaining such person or any person smuggling words in Section 31 of the Trafficking Prevention Act, 1977, the person linked to the fact that smuggling And what was the crime of collecting wealth. It cannot be explained by his own name or the names of relatives or co-workers and the legal heirs of the person who suspected that he had acquired the property through smuggling income that was given to the appellants, who was the forerunner in interest. Was the legal heir of criminal advocate from Leepa lawyer