I.T.A. NO. 855/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 30TH APRIL, 2003. versus I.T.A. NO. 855/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 30TH APRIL, 2003.
Section 13 (1) (a) The record of the sales tax officer's assessment of the intentions of the additional advance parties by the consumer, purely based on the sales tax record, was not binding on the fact that the parties mentioned were genuine parties. Section 13 (1) (a)) was redeemed by the Customer in advance of the Advance Parties Conflict against the Advance Money The dispute was that the invalidity of such parties was automatically approved by the Assessing Officer on the sale approval. Stand out who didn't realize that sales can't be estimated. This means that this person has been dishonestly claimed that the money was actually made to the SC / Company.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
