Find a Lawyer

NAZIR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) definitions of evidence were fully confirmed by the Ocular Account of Medical Evidence and the defendant failed to identify any contradiction between the eyewitness accounts and medical evidence; In the absence of background, no question was raised on the false case of the accused. The accused allegedly made a dagger blow on the deceased person, who was a co-accused, who was empty-handed and was declared Larkara's character and after being trapped in his custody, the trial court finally arrested him as the second co-accused. Dismissed because of the High Court case, the FIR was lodged, the question of consideration and counsel will not arise, the prosecution does not have any Work to prove your case against an accused through an ocular account coming from an unforgivable source after coming from an exemption source. Was getting Medical evidence, but the prosecution failed to prove the motive of the incident which remains is that the accused in the mystery struck the victim of the dagger with only one injury and did not repeat the blow, the accused said. I did not offer any independent testimony by the prosecution in connection with the knife / dagger recovery, yet independent witnesses were available at the time. The alleged retrieval, which was a clear violation of Section 103, allowed the CCP defendant to be convicted, but, in view of these tense circumstances, the trial court reduced the death sentence to the accused in Section 382B, Life sentence was imposed with the benefit of CRPC. best law firms from Landi Kotal lawyer