Find a Lawyer

C. A. NO. 1550/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 26TH FEBRUARY, 2002. versus C. A. NO. 1550/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 26TH FEBRUARY, 2002.

Seizure and seizure of goods In violation of section 15 or section 16 of the Customs Act, 1969, the possession of auto parts for the possession of a donkey cart was denied, Initially by the claimant who owned the person, the goods rabbis then claimed ownership of such goods and claimed that the auto parts were actually ancient scrap that was purchased from the Cabaria market and not heard. Because the person who initially claimed ownership of such goods kept them away from the preliminary proceedings. Saying that he himself will take care of the appellant's case. The appellant should be provided with an opportunity to prove his ownership of the seized goods. When the claim of ownership is established by the Adjudicating Officer during the proceedings, then the decision-making officer will be involved in the question whether the seized The goods were in fact spare parts (old and used) of foreign origin, and if so, they were given a legally imported order to the extent of confiscating the goods, and the appellate tribunal adjusted the case for a new judgment according to law. The officer was dispatched. online advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer