Find a Lawyer

S.T.A. NO.2806/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 8TH MARCH, 2002. versus S.T.A. NO.2806/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 8TH MARCH, 2002.

Sections 36 (3), 6, 7, 8, and 23 of RO 124 (I) / 2000, dated 15 3 2000 Adjusting on tax bills without determining the exact tax liabilities of the collection of tax levied. The SC / tax payer of the Input Tax Bearing Registration Number asserts that the amount due was not determined and to the extent that the order violates Section 36 (3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the Appellant affirmed. The tribunal instructed the judicial officer to keep the claim in mind. View of donkeys / taxpayers requested WAPDA authority to enter their registration number on relevant electricity bills Adjudicating officer obtained necessary information from WAPDA authority if necessary, if any money was found to be recoverable. That is what the car will determine. In view of the provisions contained in Section 36 (3) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, the case was referred by the appellate tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. After sharing the evidence and getting the evidence they might like to present advocates from Padidan lawyer