Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAVED versus THE STATE

Section 1616/1 331/7 427 / evidence 34 Definition of evidence was not denied by the accused itself, but it was stated in the petition that the victim of the accident fell while riding the bus. The driver had hit the bus driven by the accused and he was injured and later, due to the injuries sustained in the process, he was summoned which the accused had just stated to show. Argued that it was a pure and simple accident, that there was an undeniable consequence of wrong evidence on the record, that he was driving his own bus, that he belonged to his rival party. He was given the push that was already standing on the same place, the deceased fell between buses and the results prove that injured him before the trial court and fatal consequences. Consistent with the record, the case was retained under Section 161616, the PPC has been brought against the accused, he was rightly sentenced by the trial court and ordered to pay Ditto seven years imprisonment. The RI waiting suspect was converted into a prisoner as a trader, but has already been converted into a prisoner by them. The acquittal partner was not required to interfere with the trial court's decision best law firm from Laliah lawyer