Find a Lawyer

MESSRS AL-HADDID ENGINEERING WORKS, FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 36 and Sixth Schedule, Section 44 Section RO 987 (I) (99), dated 30 8 1999 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of Office of Establishment (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) collection of tax Notices have been imposed or summarized, notice of increase in the amount of supply for tax collection, sales tax receipt rate or show cause notice for collection of tax without any specification, It has been reported that the notice of the Welderty Show was originally reproduced by the Directorate of Revenue Receipts Audit Audit Officer's report only received from the complainant / reviewer. The lease shows tax data, which shows no indication of how the figures were reached in the showcase notes, and even the amounts were not shown to sales tax suppliers. Without disclosing the basis for the sales tax data, the showcase notice remained vague, illegal and attracted the jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman section 36. The Sales Tax Act, 1990, regulates proceedings initiated in violation of the Sales Tax Act 1990 and may result in recoveries and penalties, therefore, it was important that the Federal Tax Ombudsman be followed. It is recommended that the show cause notice, withdrawn on 23 10 2002, be issued again if the show cause notice should be issued under which the contents of the provisions of section 36 should be identified and also the sales. The basis for any tax amount should be given. Received from Complainant / Assisi advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer