Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus HANIF BILAL

An appeal against the FIR in the Section 417 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), a section 302 case was filed immediately and the presence of the complainant at the time of the incident cannot be doubted, medical evidence. The Ocular Account was fully authenticated by and at the time of the incident there was no record of previous enmity between the parties certified by the medical evidence and this was not an alternative case, although both witnesses were deceased. Related, but they had no reason to falsely implicate the accused, otherwise they would simply rush to a witness He was. The victim or the complainant had no standard to dismiss their evidence if it was otherwise credible and if they came from a firearm expert's inadvertent source in connection with an empty and pistol export offense on the indictment of the accused. It was a crime and the plantation was a weapon. The crime was empty, under the circumstances, defense witnesses were never presented to the police, but they appeared before the trial court for the first time, in addition to the fact that the draftsman showed an electric pole at the scene. Yes, the parties knew each other, there was no case of mistaken identity; in the circumstances the brother's name was mentioned in the FIR, but it was not presented, before the trial. It was not that all the persons mentioned in the FIR should be produced before the trial court because the court had to establish the standard of proof and its Quantity or value of internal evidence that the stimulus had to be established by the prosecution trial court prosecution case you have law firms from Tarnol lawyer