Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 bail, further investigating accused were not named in the FIR and their names were found in additional statements of the complainant and the prosecution witness. About a month and nine days after the alleged incident, the alleged kidnapper rejected the complainant's version, according to the complaint filed in the FLR, and he owned his marriage with the co-accused. As mentioned in the FLR. The accused and the alleged kidnapper were not recovered from them, but were presented by someone else. No accused of adultery was charged against the accused. All such facts must have been presented to the accused. Which was further investigated which was covered under section 497 (2). , CCP accused were behind bars and were not ex-convicts; in these cases the accused were admitted on bail. advocates from Ugoki lawyer