Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHAD ALI versus THE STATE

The plaintiffs were charged with dismissing section 616161 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 324/337 H (ii) / 337 L (ii) / 337 F (v) / 148/149, But the petitioner was not cleared by the trial court acquitted all the accused, but on appeal from the complainant against Brayat, the appellate court fixed the verdict of Brayat and demanded the trial court on remand. Applicant's request to seek petitioner was dismissed. The trial court, but the appellate court reversed the trial court's order and said that the petitioner should also be filed against the applicant under section 6161 AA, CCPC, said the appellate court judicial petitioner, who was under investigation. Was found innocent under the order of the found. Section 1 Section69, CRPC was not by the police nor was it classified under Section 7373, CRPC, Column 2 or 3 of the challan, nor invoiced nor prosecuted. Was sent for hearing. Prevent the applicant's innocence at any stage before sending the trial to the trial court, which would mean that the complainant was satisfied with the inquiry. Police did not convict the applicant in the appellate court order at any stage. Had given. Directed that the petitioner should be prosecuted, which was set aside by the High Court in the circumstances. immigration advocate from Dinga lawyer