Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD SHARIF ANSARI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 13 Establishment of Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV 2000V), Section 2 (3) is considered to increase income, eliminating the document, from the Assessing Officer's Report to the file of the examining officer at respondents' request. The demand was justified by a heavy scrutiny justifying the huge increase in income for the construction of houses, which apparently showed that it was beyond the capacity of the complainant / SC to include two officers, a special officer and an inspector. A serious note is required on the payment, because if the department officials are privately party Not only will the fraudulent and irrevocable offer arise from the pleadings and any party, but the credibility of the department will be severely impacted by the Federal, Federal Tax Ombudsman, Commissioner of Income Tax has powers under Section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 Recommended modifying the use review so that the correct tax amount will be charged. The investigation is undertaken to determine the responsibility of not keeping the file on documents such as (a) the description on 249 2002 which was accepted by the relevant officer and given to the record keeper, and (b) the inspector's report. And action against appropriate officer should be taken under the confiscation rules when the inspector is specifically asked to specify the reason for withdrawing the statement given at the time of the complainant / reviewer's hearing. online advocate from Karak lawyer