Find a Lawyer

SYED NAJAM-UL-HASSAN PROPRIETOR HUR INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 100, 163, 156 and 66 Income Tax Ordinance (XLEX of 2001), Section 170 Establishment of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (2000 XXV), Section 2 (3) Return on Assessment and Appeal etc. , Etc. Tax credits were granted only The non-payment of the refund proceedings initiated under Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was made on the request of the taxpayer to the extent of the tax, the Appellate Tribunal once again challaned the return. On the pretext of validation. The return, even after the invoice was verified, pointed to financial rumors under the scope of the Federal Corruption ???? Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman under section 2 (3) of the Ordinance, recommended by the 2000 Federal Tax Ombudsman. That the refund should be received from it under section 170 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the date of assessment of 23 1999 1999 should be issued soon and the delay will be worked out under additional payment. Sections 171 to 79 1999 when the withdrawal was made by amending section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. jobs for fresh advocates from Shahpur Chakar lawyer