Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 3550/LB TO 3352/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 8TH APRIL, 2003. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 3550/LB TO 3352/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 8TH APRIL, 2003.

Sections 66A and 59 (1) Additional Commissioner Self Assessment Assessment Options were formulated under the Self Assessment Scheme Tax, which was compiled on IT 30 and only the Demand Notice was issued without a written assessment order. The cancellation of such an assessment under section 66A provides that the Ordinance, Section 59 (1) of the Inspector Assistant Commissioner's inspection of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, provides that a Deputy Commissioner be filed for ordering a valid assessment. On the basis of the returns, the total income of the assessee has to be assessed, after which it is the responsibility of the Assessing Officer to pay the Assessing Officer. Pass the order in writing in compliance with the assessment made and the resulting tax will be determined when there was an order under section 59 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Passed, none of them had taken any assessment officer nor any assessment officer nor any order had any determination to pay any tax through section 59 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Was not formulated, which was taxed on IT IT and demanded notice, without a written assessment order, was not a legally durable order under section 59 (1). The formal order of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 could not be considered, under which the amending jurisdiction of the Additional Commissioner inspecting under Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, could be made by the Appellate Tribunal under section 66. The order passed by the Inspector Additional Commissioner was vacated. For all years considering another Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Assessing Officer tax advocates from Sanghar lawyer