Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ASHOK KUMAR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD


Section 63, 54; 50 (7E) and 62 Income Tax Ordinances (XLIX of 2001), Section 122 Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) The best judgment test against the date and without validity of reason. This was contrary to its previous history. It was not assessed and based or, for any good reason, the officer assessing the invalid, unreasonable and perverse test did not bring any material evidence to the record to justify the count of the federal tax ombudsman. Recommended that the order approved for the year 2002 be amended. Under section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, and after providing appropriate opportunities to the reviewer, income tax should be worked out in accordance with the law and facts of the Income Tax Ordinance.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Chitral lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.