Find a Lawyer

KHALID versus THE STATE

The value of the evidence of Section (E) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 365 A / 149, 395 and 148 after the kidnappers received ransom of Rs 13,00,000 in school by the accused. What happened was that Victim mentioned the names of all the suspects and identified them during the identification parade; the ransom money was recovered from the accused during physical remand. The conviction and sentence were maintained under the circumstances, however, the trial court had charged the accused under Sections 365A / 149, 395 and 148, PPC, but not enough to prove the same evidence. According to the prosecution record, he did not acquit nor convict the High Court on these charges, hence, the accused was sentenced under Sec. 365A / 149, 395 and 148, The PPC sentenced them and each of them to life imprisonment with confiscation of property, a fine of Rs 50,000 for ten years RI and two years RI for consolidating all the sentences under section 382, respectively. Directed However, the BCRPC was not given to the accused because of their undesirable function, according to which the appeal was dealt with. law firms from North Wazirstan lawyer