Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 1381/KB TO 1383/KB OF 2002, DEICED ON 20TH MAY, 2003. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1381/KB TO 1383/KB OF 2002, DEICED ON 20TH MAY, 2003.

Firm of Sections 156, 68, 52 and 86 Failure to Delegate Registration Tax of Individuals or Failure to Pay Individual Liability As per Income Tax Ordinance 1979 86, the Firm has made Income Tax under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Section 156 of the Ordinance 1979 carries out its role as a voltage holding agent as that status can be modified. The partners had died. Certificate was issued from the Registrar of the Registrar to the Registrar Firm as a Registrar of the Registry Firm by the Assessing Officer of the original order under Section 68 of the Income Tax. The ordinance, 1979 did not make any mistake by dividing the firm's profitability into old partners, the return was apparently shown as a partner when the status of the registered firm was claimed when in any of the subsequent estimates. Without submitting an application for registration, the Assisting Officer went out of his jurisdiction when passing an order under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Any evidence already available on record was added to them to claim that there was a change in the firm's constitution such that additional evidence that was not available to the assessing officer was actually made by the appraising officer The source could not be considered. Grab that error record Pakistan, top advocate family court from Darya Khan lawyer