Find a Lawyer

MESSRS NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE CO., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 102, 103 and 100 Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Section 171 Compensation for late refund, Department non-payment was agreed to issue refund but despite maintaining accounts on Complainant / Basic con recovery basis Hiding was a crime to hide. Under section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, income received from compensation was never declared in the relevant profits, and adjustments could be made after determining the tax on that income, hence the compensation due. The department was fined, which should have been issued with all clear, cumulative return issuance as to whether the amount of compensation as compensation receipt would be taxable in the hands of the complainant / reviewer. And there was an independent case such as the suspension of operations and the lack of funds to eliminate the complainant / expected tax liability. Or collect damages was assmysy, should be considered when making the original amount of the refund, you may be prevented as permitted under the Income Tax Ordinance, Section 1979 103, if the compensation under reasonable basis. In terms of Section 171 of Section 102 I, the refund was a logical and inevitable Income Tax Ordinance 2001, as it was under section 100 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the exclusion of exclusionary compensation to accommodate potential tax demand. Deferring, it was clearly understood that a move to eliminate the error in this case should be concealed. The Administration / Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that additional payment for the delayed repayment be immediately implemented under section 171 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 top advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer