I.T.A. NO.5724/LB OF 2002 AND I.T.A. NO. 145/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 31ST MAY, 2003. versus I.T.A. NO.5724/LB OF 2002 AND I.T.A. NO. 145/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 31ST MAY, 2003.
Article 62 Survey of the National Economy Ordinance (XV of 2000), There is no firm basis for estimating higher turnover than the forecast survey team, which was assessed by the Assessing Officer at Rs.25 lakh. At the time of the survey, there was a consensus on a turnover of Rs. 17 lakhs. If this department has strong evidence that the announcement made by Sakashi was not valid, then it should be formally contested. Was a regular MAR reference. The general investigation conducted by the inspector did not result in law. The inspector did not produce inventory of stock clearly available at the Scussey business premises and no copy was ever given to the Assassin for the Assessment Assessment Officer. The appellate tribunal directed that the sales estimate be kept at Rs 17 lakh during the year, as agreed to by the agreement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
