Find a Lawyer

BILAWAL versus THE STATE

Section 13 D&13E Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), section 103 law defines evidence in the evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 37, 39 and 40 if the provisions of Section 103 were made advisory in this case. The CCP will make it clear that if a search for a house was made by a policeman, then it is applicable in this case, in the present case, no house was searched. To obtain the evidence, but the police had reportedly prepared the weapons themselves by going to the relevant places on the information provided by the accused, who had alleged that they would produce the weapons used in the commission of the crime. And in pursuit of the above information was discovered. Such information which was admissible in evidence was secured under Article 40 of the Convention Evidence, 1984, against a police officer, was not admissible, but the law was Shahadat, Article 40 of 1984 was Convention Evidence 1984, Article 37 and The exception to 39, whereby his confession could be found to be a crime and the confession of trade that was provided to the police while in the custody of the accused, was admissible in the evidence by the police officer. The matter was proved and unlicensed weapons were secured with this information. Such evidence is valid and lawful against the accused. Ni can be used jobs for fresh advocates from Neelam lawyer