MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus THE STATE
The accused was intended to praise Section 5B5B more than the Koran, etc., so that no person could be convicted of this intention without acting before the commission of a crime, but punishment was based on mere assumptions or doubts. Can't be There was need to be unrecognizable and unrecognizable evidence to link the accused to the commission of the crime, if in the present case, it is thought that some rappers would be used to bind Quranic suppressors to defile the Quran. To do. There may also be an assumption that, while the aforementioned rappers were not yet used for a binding purpose, that they were set aside for disposal, the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond any doubt. Yes, the conviction and sentence passed against the accused was set aside and the accused was ordered to increase the benefit of the doubt by H and acquit him of the charge. igh court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Tall lawyer
