SH. MUNEERUDDIN versus S.D.O., WAPDA, SUB-DIVISION JIA MUSA, SHAHDARA, LAHORE
Article 39 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Case and Application of Termination of Section 11 FIR Constitutional Application, Maintaining Authority in the Current Case, Application under FIR under Section 39A A criminal case has been registered against the petitioner. The petition was filed by the High Court, praying for the termination of the FIR of the Constitutional Application of Electricity Act, 1910, the petitioner filed another constitutional petition with the prayer that the authority made the money in question by the applicant. Recovery should be banned until a final decision is made by the competent authority. The authority / power magistrate, which dismissed the High Court's civil procedure code principles, 1908 for non-prosecution because of its application to proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution, the present constitutional petition was not applicable, That is why they give relief in relief. However, the criminal and civil proceedings of section 11, CPC can be initiated Many constitutional petitions were rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Sohawa District Daska lawyer