Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE

Sections 265F (3), 435, 439 and 540 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/109/148/149 Appeal to summon a court witness applicant seeking to have a deputy prosecutor Has entered At that point, a court witness, when the report was submitted under section 17373, CRPC, framed the charge and the evidence of the prosecution was already listed, before the petitioner sought reconsideration of Patwari. The petition was dismissed by the trial court and the revision filed against the dismissal order was also dismissed. No such petition has been moved by the applicant before the High Court when the prosecutor was asked to present evidence in support of the case when the petitioner was asked to move the petition to seek the testimony of the court. There is no compelling reason to believe that no new fact was realized on the move later. The defensive version was launched to frustrate the petitioners who had already completed their cross-examination on witnesses. Section 540, CRPC, has the discretion that if its evidence was deemed necessary for the decision of a case, and under section 265F (3), the CCPC has been empowered to make any such Refuse to summon the witness. The court held that such a witness was being called for the purpose of seeking justice or delaying or defeating the end of justice The trial court rightly refused to exercise its discretion under section 54040, CCP Cannot interfere in a reasonable order approved by the trial court. In review by the High Court Pakistan, top advocate family court from Guddu lawyer