Find a Lawyer

RAMESH M. UDESHI versus THE STATE

Sections 9, 10, 14, 25 and 32 of the Sindh Government Rules of Business, 1986, 17, 25 and 28 accuse the accused against the accused, who was the Secretary, Land Use Department, Provincial Board of Revenue at the relevant time, Was, with other suspects, fraudulent and under criminal intent - useful for the underground land exchange for the Chief Minister, due to wrongful use of the land to the accused / beneficiary and damaging the Government. The reason presented was that, of course, through all the relevant secretaries, the Secretary of Finance and the Secretary of the Treasury, recorded their notes on it. And there was no illegal action by the accused, nor was he related or interested in anything. Any beneficiary of such land under question was already surrendered by the applicant bargaining under Section 25 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 19. and 99 and the National Inquiry was not harmed The surplus money deposited by the beneficiary was confiscated on the official evidence on the record, which states that the accused was floating that the summary was all the time. The car was made with full observation and the relevant report was obtained. The deputy commissioner and all the facts were brought to the forefront by this summary, each time the Chief Secretary put his hand on the summary and recorded his note, and even on the principle of the Chief Secretary, the final order was approved by the Chief Minister. No action was taken by the accused for violating the legal plane, Sindh Government Rules of Business, 1986, on the whole of the evidence found on record. advocate from Makran lawyer