Find a Lawyer

MRS. RAFIA AJAZ versus HAJI MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Appeal for dismissal of the complainants of Sections 145 and 561 of the proceedings, in their complaint under Section 145, CRPC, it was stated that the contract of sale of the property owned by the applicant was settled between him and the applicant. Was found and the applicant received a substantial amount of the total amount to consider the complainant and the complainant was given possession of the house in question and the balance of consideration at the time of execution of the sale agreement. The complainant alleged that the applicant had forcibly expelled her from the house and threatened her with serious The findings, in the case, that a claim by the complainant magistrate in connection with the house issued notice to the applicants for their submission and proceeded to record the evidence, the applicants filed an application under section 6161A, c. The RPC said this is a case that has been charged. The applicant, without any evidence, alleged that the complainant had failed to pay the balance amount. On the other hand, the complainant regarding the due date could not mention when the house was occupied. It initially appeared that the occupant's order was not granted under complaint number 45 the (1), was approved by the CRPC for allegedly destroying the complainant. About one year and nine months before the magistrate, no order of restoration of the magistrate's house could be approved by the magistrate and proceedings before the magistrate. Or possibly for occupation could not get the result of an order and the extent it will become a invalid complaint. It immigration advocates email from Sambrial lawyer