ARFEEN INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED, KARACHI versus COLLECTOR CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT) DRY PORT, LAHORE
Section 209 The weight of the goods is shown in the shipping papers and is found on the spot inspection which was higher than that shown on the entry quota shipment bill. Implied accuracy The importer did not order a direct import with the seller, but was transferred by the appellant as well. The appellant's factum was his agent's assignment under section 209 of the Customs Act, as he was the agent of the seller. Thus in 1969, it was acknowledged that the disparity in weight was attempted to seduce customs officials and to sell more goods in the black market, which could be used to manufacture heroin. It was to examine and confirm whether the import of the goods suffered by it was in accordance with the import policy order for the application for a long time to ask Eleventh to act as a seller's agent. Or he did not know about the consignment of the goods, the seller (principal) submitted the liability on the basis of invalid judgment. The final result of the fact against the appellant was not shown. There is no question of interference with the guarantee of the law in the appeal against the weight of the record or the evidence of its import. The High Court dismisses the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Issa Khel lawyer